I'd like to see case law that defines how far they'll stretch that. The way the law is written it uses the phrase ".is capable of accepting a detachable magazine.". I was a NYSP Trooper for better than 20 years and I've seen how "legalise" starts out meaning one thing and ends up meaning another. ![]() "Know your 'legalese'." See, that's the problem. Perhaps my Winchester 401 and my Model 100 (both with detachable magazines) will be the NEXT thing they take issue with. NOTE: SKS carbines are about the ONLY sem-autos that are NOT on the list. I'm considering removing my pistol grips and asking someone to tack weld (ie: MIG) a piece of sheet metal over the hole that the AK pistol grip bolt goes through. I think it would behoove NY'ers to actually visit Cuomo's website and actually SEE what THEY consider under the scope of the new law - almost exclusively AK and AR variants, but will also include M1A's (detachable magazines and muzzle brake.) Heck, Mauser magazines (floorplate, spring, and follower) are removeable, but are not considered DETACHABLE. "DETACHABLE" does not equal "removeable". SKS fixed box magazines are NOT detachable (unless they take AK mags) AK magazines ARE detachable. That a fer sure thing Dan? I read the law over about 10 times and it looked like the SKS qualified since the mag can be taken out and replaced with a removable mag?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |